As a future educator, I feel
standardization is one of the
inappropriate things in a public school. I have always found fault in
standardized tests at
instruments of
intelligence because they are biased, reduce the scope and
quantity course work,
diminish the role of teachers and do not make students active learners.
Over the summer, in my class, we
discussed how biased
standardized tests are. They are culturally biased towards the
dominate class, as evident in scores. Suburban schools do much better then inner city schools, generally, but you can not hold students to the same standards. Students have different
experiences they bring the test, that affects performance. I do not like
standardized tests because they are high stakes tests. The funding a school district gets is dependent on how well students do. This means teachers try to drill information into the students. This does not make students active learners, but rather passive learners. I think active learning is essential because it
teaches students to solve problems. I think memorization servers a purpose, but how many of actually remember what we memorized in a high school class? I think problem solving solving and
analysis is more important and it prepares students for the real world / college.
The other problem I have with
standardization is that the state has a lot to do with it. State legislators write the standards and make the tests high stakes test. What does the
politicians have to do with schools? They are not teachers, they do not know how to measure student performance. Most of they probably could not eve describe what scope and sequence is. Yet, buraracteric reforms are imposed on schools in the name of objectivity and and equality. I think educate should be authentic to the student, meaning to their
experiences. Learning should be something the students should know and they get
excited about.